|
|
Anamika Dhaske, Indiana University Indianapolis
Govind Dhaske, The University of Montana
The Eastern mindfulness, originally evolved from experiential and consciousness-centered spiritual-cultural tradition, has evolved in America, showing a phenomenological paradigmatic displacement. The multi-layered and adaptive dispersion of mindfulness into clinical psychology (Goyal et al., 2014), corporate wellness, neuroscience, and digital therapeutics is often framed as natural integration. However, it represents a complex, emergent process shaped by recursive social, scientific, and institutional interactions (Byrne & Callaghan, 2014). The mindfulness in America has followed a nonlinear trajectory and undergone continuous reinterpretation and restructuring across diverse disciplinary and professional domains. This paper applies complexity science to analyze how mindfulness has been shaping as an open system while continuously adapting to scientific discourse, policy regulations, market demands, and technological mediation. Across diverse disciplines, mindfulness frameworks undergo further paradigmatic complexity while showing a dynamic self-organization with evolving structure and meaning. The central factor that dynamically redefines mindfulness within the structured paradigms is the process of scientific validation, which adds feedback loops. Incrementally, these recursive interactions have led to emergent consequences centered around digital mindfulness tools that have transformed the traditional contemplative approaches in unpredictable ways (Wilson, 2014). Within these inherent involutions through paradigmatic displacement, the complexity of mindfulness is selectively filtered. As a result, the institutional adoption of mindfulness is primarily measured, structured, and made actionable, but its nonlinear, phenomenological, and transformative dimensions gradually get erased (Kabat-Zinn, 2013). A meta-theoretical exploration of the historical complexity of mindfulness is offered in this paper through recognizing it as a dynamic practice and self-evolving phenomenon. Instead of resolving authenticity issues, it shows how mindfulness in America is a self-organizing social phenomenon, where economic, technological, and cultural forces co-create new, frequently unexplained forms of contemplative practice while simultaneously limiting the complexity of what is allowed to emerge.
Presented in Session 159. Disparities in Recent Technological Health Advancements